Selection for Universal Facial Emotion
Alex Hilser
With
all of our faces looking so different, it is hard to imagine that humans have a
similar set of facial patterns that are universal to expressing emotion. Additionally,
the knowledge that not all people share similar facial muscles and that an
individual can even have asymmetric muscle expressions, makes it seem even more far-fetched of an idea. But despite the assumed improbability, researchers out
of Duquesne University and University of Pittsburgh have identified essential
muscles present in everyone that help code for the most basic of human
emotions. This helps to show the universality of emotions and how facial
muscles have evolved to correspond with such feelings.
Using
19 cadavers (7 males and 11 females, between 61 and 100 years old) the
scientists went about the study by dissecting the facial muscles and categorizing
the musculature. They categorized them using Table 1, which divides muscles into emotional groups. These groups are:
Happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, fear, and disgust. These muscles are
listed in Figure 1 and serve to show
how lighter colored muscles are more universal (serve to exhibit all basic
emotions), while the darker musculature is used to give each person their own
complex “signature” to an emotional expression.
In the
subjects, the large determiner of basic vs. complex was their prevalence and inclination
toward asymmetry. The basic subset had no variation in existence of muscles and
those muscles were very unlikely asymmetrical. The complex subset, on the other
hand, contained many muscles that only few people had and in many cases there were
great variations in symmetrical exhibition of the musculature. The basic sub
group, as per their description, had at least one type of muscle recruited for each
basic emotion expressed (very universal) and it was the complex subgroups job
to add the individualism because they varied from person to person (highly
variable).
So how
does this affect you? And how does this tie in to evolution?
With a
verification of a basic subgroup of facial musculature, that means that humans
have evolved along the premise that “I feel this, I will activate this muscles”.
This means that there is an innate sense of emotion and there is a very
universal display at the most basic level. This is where evolution comes into
play. With everyone expressing basic emotions, there has to be a way that
people can express emotions that are more beneficial to mating. This means as
individual variances occur to facial expressions in the population, there can
be increased desire for a trait and then that musculature will only be present
and developed in that lineage. This is made more complicated by the different
desires of women in the human population, meaning many different types of musculature
variations can find a way of being up-regulated in the gene pool. Showing how
evolution has helped humans to evolve our basic subset, and natural selection
has continued to shape the face of emotion.
Word Count: 488
Waller, B.M. & Cray Jr, J.J. (2008). Selection for
Universal Facial Emotion. Emotion. American
Psychological Association, Volume 8, pp. 435-439. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.435


Very interesting idea, I have never really thought about how different people show emotion in their faces; it is normally something you take for granted. However, it is true that while I am able to move both of my eyebrows separately and together, other people I know can't. Another example is dimples, I've heard that dimples are actually malformations, which shows that some defects are not deadly.
ReplyDeleteWere women and men categorized into different facial muscle subgroups at the same rate? It would be interesting to see what type of emotions are more important for women and which ones are more important for men, if there is a difference.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting idea. I wonder which facial expression is the most popular among humans, maybe smiling.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to explore how facial expressions are of evolutionary importance to more behaviors than just mating. Perhaps they served as an early form of communication and allowed us to more efficiently function in groups. I also wonder when facial expressions became part of our species - did we use them before we began communicating with language? Did facial expressions change as language developed? Perhaps become more complex or specific?
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to think about how expressing facial emotions is almost exclusively human trait.
ReplyDeleteThis paper was very interesting, especially the fact that we have specific muscles that our universal to all of us and give us universal facial expressions, while other muscles provide us with our own unique signature facial expressions.
ReplyDeleteFascinating! I wonder which facial expressions were selected against throughout human evolution?
ReplyDeleteIt is fascinating that there are innate facial responses to external stimuli and it makes me wonder whether there are people or cultures out there that respond to fear by smiling, or some other seemingly inappropriate response.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting article! However, I have to question how large of a role facial expressions really play in the selection of mates. I suppose over the entire history of human evolution any small phenotypic variation can have an impact, but how does that account for "ugly" people who don't have their facial muscles in sync?
ReplyDelete